Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy Jim Glassman was on BBC Radio this morning. Listen to the short 5:33 interview in which he reiterates that likability is no longer the goal of U.S. public diplomacy. He notes that in our seven years since 9/11 that our policies have evolved and that out "standing of the U.S. in the world is important because it makes it easier for us to achieve our interests, but ... improving our image is not an end itself." Public diplomacy must, as he says and as I've written, must expand beyond the traditional tools.
"Over the last seven years, our policies have evolved" (Updated)
Categories:
Leave a comment
In the News
- A Proposal for Reorganization at Foggy Bottom at PPI
- Hybrid Threats Require a Hybrid Government at the Stimson Center
- State Dept Project Signals Foreign Policy Shift at The Washington Independent
- Hitting Bottom at Foggy Bottom at ForeignPolicy.com
- Censoring the Voice of America at ForeignPolicy.com
- Persuasive politics: Revisit the Smith-Mundt Act, op-ed in The Washington Times
- Foreign outreach called deficient
Guest Authors
Ali Fisher
Benerson Little
Carson Thomas Checketts
Charles N. Quigley
Chris Tomlinson
Christopher Dufour
Christopher Paul
David Earl
Hans Tuch
John H. Brown
Larisa Breton
Mark Pfeifle
Marlene M. Johnson
Matt Morgan
Mitchell Polman
Nina Keim
Peggie Duggan
Rep. Mac Thornberry (R-TX)
Shane Deichman
Sherry Mueller
Simon Anholt
Thomas Brouns
Tiger Zhang
TOX
Ursula Oaks
Yale Richmond
Categories
- Admin (91)
- Africa (69)
- Book Reviews (50)
- China (33)
- Civil-Military Relations (101)
- Classifieds (1)
- Congress (19)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (1)
- Cultural Diplomacy (2)
- Defense Department (20)
- Definitions (3)
- Development (6)
- Events (51)
- Featured (22)
- Gov Engagement (16)
- Guest Posts (5)
- ICT (192)
- Intelligence (13)
- Interagency (59)
- Media (89)
- Money and Resources (22)
- Non-State Actors (11)
- Now Media (44)
- Other (129)
- Peacekeeping (28)
- Private Military Companies (156)
- Psychological Struggle (239)
- Public Affairs (118)
- Public Diplomacy (713)
- Reports (6)
- Smith-Mundt (95)
- Social Media (24)
- State Building (57)
- State Department (36)
- Terrorism (49)
- War (146)
Related Entries
- Congress steps up: a caucus for strategic communication and public diplomacy
Categories: Congress, Public Diplomacy - Establishing the Strategic Communication and Public Diplomacy Caucus
Categories: Congress, Public Diplomacy, Smith-Mundt, State Department - This week: The Future of US Public Diplomacy
Categories: Public Diplomacy, State Department - An update on VOA Persia's iPhone App
Categories: Gov Engagement, ICT, Public Diplomacy - National Defense University seeks public diplomacy professor
Categories: Defense Department, Public Diplomacy, Teaching / Training - IIP responds to Pat Kushlis on IIP's "Creative Destruction"
Categories: Public Diplomacy, State Department - Rescheduled: public meeting of the US Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy
Categories: Public Diplomacy - Information as Power survey: what date works best for you?
Categories: Now Media, Psychological Struggle, Public Diplomacy, Social Media, Teaching / Training
This goes hand-in-hand with what McCain said in St Louis last week about how "America never apologies for history, it makes history."
The arrogance of that statement then, and Glassman's comments here further reinforce the notion that parts of this government are hell-bent on the Big Stick approach favoring unilaterial action while overlooking bilateral consequences. The idea of blowback never crosses into these folks' mind. :(
Rick,
I do agree that your comments in general but disagree with your grouping Glassman with the bunch. Glassman, while distancing himself from the administration before he joined just a few months ago, did say that he saw what is now called the say-do gap as well as the emphasis on the Big Stick, dropping the Speaking Softly, which is your point.
Matt