This shows Lara Logan’s lament about television’s cutback is a reality in print.
The survey used three different measures to probe the question. It asked about space devoted to a range of topics. It asked about the amount of reporting resources assigned to cover each topic. And it asked how essential editors thought each topic was to their paper’s identity.
By all three measures, international news is rapidly losing ground at rates greater than any other topic area. Roughly two-thirds (64%) of newsroom executives said the space devoted to foreign news in their newspaper had dropped over the past three years. Nearly half (46%) say they have reduced the resources devoted to covering the topic-also the highest percentage recording a drop. Only 10% said they considered foreign coverage “very essential.”
This decline in foreign news occurs as U.S. armed forces confront stubborn insurgencies in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Administration talks of a global war on terrorism and international trade increasingly impacts the everyday lives of Americans.
Is domestic broadcast media picking up the slack? Kim shares a report that CNN might be with (only?) one show: Fareed Zakaria’s GPS:
“‘Fareed Zakaria GPS’ (GPS stands for ‘Global Public Square’) … is, in effect, an international version of “Meet The Press,” with prominent newsmakers answering his tough, well-researched questions. … In an era in which Americans are demanding — and thus getting — less international news, Zakaria’s ‘GPS’ is an auspicious event indeed. Only ‘BBC World News’ has been offering this kind of responsible global perspective and news to U.S. view." Bill Mann, Press Democrat (Santa Rosa, CA), 20 July 2008.
Obviously the first story has Smith-Mundt implications – who tells the story of what’s happening overseas if it isn’t the media? Telling “America’s story to the world”? What about telling it at home? At one time, the major media, print and broadcast, and the government had a cooperative relationship. At one time, the products of US information activities were to be easily available to academics, Congress, and the media and were not to be under any limit on domestic redistribution. Things have changed. Today, the American public knows little about what is said and done in its name overseas. Today, the American public is subject to the “inform but not influence” mentality of press releases and sound bites designed not to educate, engage, and truly inform but to pierce the media’s filter.
Once upon a time, the government subsidized the overseas purchase of US news, books, and film to the tune of $15m in 1948. The Informational Media Guarantee program was put (buried) into the European Recover Act, aka the Marshall Plan. Think we should do that again? Makes you think.
Unrelated, congratulations to Chris Albon and his journey with SOUTHCOM on the USS Kearsarge.
That’s it for now.