• About Matt
  • About the Blog
  • Privacy Policy in Plain English
  • Contact
MountainRunner.us

Discussions on public diplomacy and political warfare and occasionally other topics affecting national security

  • Posts at War on the Rocks
  • “In case you missed it”
  • Subscribe
  • Posts at War on the Rocks
  • “In case you missed it”
  • Subscribe
Public Diplomacy,  State Department

Amb. Marks: A Proposal for the Consolidation of the Management of Foreign Affairs

March 18, 2010

Ambassador Edward Marks (ret.), with more than 40 years as a Foreign Service Officer, offers a proposal for changing the State Department. Titled A “Next Generation” Department of State: A Proposal for the Consolidation of the Management of Foreign Affairs, the whole article is article is available at AmericanDiplomacy.org.

[I]nternational relations used to concern essentially relations between governments, largely conducted by ministries of foreign affairs (except for occasionally breaks where ministries of war took over) by a process usually referred to as diplomacy.  Increasingly, however, government-to-government relations involve the whole spectrum of government activities —now including inter alia education, environmental questions, human rights, the internet  — and ministries of foreign affairs have great difficulty in holding on to even a minimal gatekeeper role.

…National governments may remain the biggest gorillas on the scene, but no longer are they alone. …

[T]he whole Department would be organized as a multi-agency “National Team” where policy and resource integration would take place at three formally designated  levels (in addition to informal coordination at all levels): at the Secretarial or Cabinet level, at the Regional Assistant Secretary level, and at the Country Team level plus in special teams or missions for emergencies.  It would be an attempt, at a higher level and much more ambitious, to duplicate the success of the DoD’s joint combatant commands by creating a joint “Department of Foreign Affairs”.

Read the whole article here.

See also:

  • A Proposal for Reorganization at Foggy Bottom by Matt Armstrong
  • Recalling History: the rising importance of people and public opinion – “There was a time when foreign affairs were ruler-to-ruler relations, when the rulers dealt privately and secretly with one another through their ambassadors…”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
Defense Departmentglobal engagementpublic diplomacyreorganizationState DepartmentStrategic Communication
By Matt Armstrong

Related Posts

The Future of Public Diplomacy, a USC conference

April 5, 2012

“An inch closer feels like a good mile” – Foreign Relations moves on Tara’s nomination

February 14, 2012

Debating the Theory vs Practice of Public Diplomacy

June 12, 2009

Recent Posts

  • Feb 09, 2019 Diplomacy’s Public Dimension: Books, Articles, Websites #94
  • Feb 09, 2019 Diplomacy’s Public Dimension: Books, Articles, Websites #93
  • Dec 06, 2018 S.3654 and Accountability for the US Agency for Global Media
  • Sep 27, 2018 1957: Eisenhower, Dulles and merging USIA back into State, or Not
  • Sep 21, 2018 Diplomacy’s Public Dimension: Books, Articles, Websites #92
  • May 10, 2018 Diplomacy’s Public Dimension: Books, Articles, Websites #91
  • Sep 21, 2017 Don’t do it: why the Foreign Agent designation is welcomed by RT and Sputnik

Categories

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
Copyright 2019 Matt Armstrong
Savona Theme by Optima Themes